So you want to answer the phone call for Papers? It includes tips for the content and presentation associated with abstract, in addition to examples of the very best abstracts submitted to your 2012-2013 selection that is abstract when it comes to ninth annual North Carolina State University graduate student history conference.
Typically, an abstract describes the topic you desire to present during the conference, highlighting your argument, evidence and contribution towards the literature that is historical. It is almost always restricted to 250-500 words. The word limit could be challenging: some graduate students try not to fret over the short limit and hastily write and submit an abstract at the last second, which frequently hurts their chances of being accepted; other students make an effort to condense the Next Great American Novel into 250 words, which are often equally damning. Graduate students who approach the abstract early, plan accordingly, and carefully edit are the ones most often invited to present their research. For those who are intimidated because of the project, don’t be – the abstract is a form that is fairly standardized of. Follow the guidelines that are basic and get away from common pitfalls and you will greatly improve your abstract.
Diligently follow all style that is abstract formatting guidelines. Most CFPs will specify word or page length, and maybe some layout or style guidelines. Some CFPs, however, will list very specific restrictions, including font, font size, spacing, text justification, margins, simple tips to present quotes, how exactly to present authors and works, whether to include footnotes or not. Ensure that you strictly stick to all guidelines, including submission instructions. If a CFP does not provide style that is abstract formatting guidelines, it is generally appropriate to stay around 250 words – abstract committees read many of these things nor look fondly on comparatively long abstracts. Be sure that you orient your abstract topic to address any specific CFP themes, time periods, methods, and/or buzzwords.
With a 250-500 word paper writing service limit, write only what exactly is necessary, avoiding wordiness. Use active voice and pay attention to excessive phrasing that is prepositional.
Plan your abstract carefully before writing it. A good abstract will address the next questions: what’s the historical question or problem? Contextualize your topic. What is your thesis/argument? It must be original. What exactly is your evidence? State forthrightly that you are using source material that is primary. How exactly does your paper squeeze into the historiography? What’s happening in the area of study and exactly how does your paper play a role in it? How come it matter? We realize the subject is essential to you, why should it be important to the abstract selection committee?
You should be as specific as you are able to, avoiding overly broad or overreaching statements and claims. And that’s it: don’t get sidetracked by writing narrative that is too much over explaining. Say what you need to say and absolutely nothing more.
Keep your audience in mind. How much background you give on a subject is determined by the conference. Is the conference a broad humanities conference, a graduate that is general history conference, or something more specific like a 1960s social revolutions conference? Your pitch should really be worthy of the specificity associated with the conference: the more specific the subject, the less background that is broad want to give and vice versa.
Revise and edit your abstract to ensure its final presentation is error free. The editing phase can be the best time to visit your abstract as a whole and chip away at unnecessary words or phrases. The final draft should be linear and clear plus it should read smoothly. If you should be tripping over something while reading, the abstract selection committee will as well. Ask another graduate student to see your abstract to ensure its clarity or attend a Graduate Student Writing Group meeting.
Your language must certanly be professional and your style should abide by academic standards. Contractions might be appealing due to the word limits, however they ought to be avoided. If citation guidelines are not specifically given, it is appropriate to use the author’s name and title of work (in either italics or quotation marks) inside the text rather than use footnotes or in-text citations.
While one question, if really good, might be posed in your abstract, you ought to avoid writing more than one (maybe two, if really really good). That you either answer it or address why the question matters to your conference paper – unless you are posing an obvious rhetorical question, you should never just let a question hang there if you do pose a question or two, make sure. A lot of questions takes up too much space and leaves less room if you are going to address one or all in your paper and if you even know the answers to them for you to develop your argument, methods, evidence, historiography, etc. Often times, posing too many questions leaves the abstract committee wondering. Remember, you are not likely to have already written your conference paper, but you are anticipated to own done enough research that you can adequately cover in 15-20 minutes that you are prepared to write about a specific topic. Demonstrate that you have done so.
Language that can help you be as specific as you can in presenting your argument is great but don’t get your readers bogged down in jargon. They will be reading plenty of abstracts and won’t wish to wade through the unnecessary language. Keep it simple.
When students repeat claims, they often don’t realize they truly are performing this. Sometimes this occurs because students are not yet clear on their argument. Consider it a few more and then write. In other cases, students write carelessly and don’t proofread. Be sure each sentence is exclusive and that it plays a role in the flow of one’s abstract.
The committee that is abstract not require to be reminded associated with grand sweep of history in order to contextualize your topic. Place your topic specifically within the historiography.
The samples below represent the five scoring samples that are highest submitted to the selection committee for the ninth annual graduate student history conference, 2012-2013. Two associated with the samples below were subsequently selected for publication in the NC State Graduate Journal of History. Outstanding papers presented at the graduate student history conference are recommended for publication by panel commentators. Papers go through a review that is peer before publication.